Archive | April, 2007
April 30, 2007

Magic Language for Offers

“The purpose of this document is to memorialize certain business points. The parties mutually acknowledge that their agreement is qualified and that they, therefore, contemplate the drafting and execution of a more detailed agreement. They intend to be bound only by the execution of such agreement and not by this preliminary document”

Goren v. Royal Investments Incorporated, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 137, 519 N.E. 2d 595 (1987)

April 29, 2007

Regina Pisa – Second Most Admired Law Firm Leader

Congratulations to Regina Pisa, the managing partner of Goodwin Procter LLP, on being labeled as the second most admired law firm leader [behind Robert M. Dell, chairman and managing partner of the law firm Latham & Watkins LLP and tied with Lee I. Miller, Firm joint chief executive officer of DLA Piper US LLP].

The survey was conducted by Edge International. Edge asked 60 law firm managing partners to identify which law firm leaders, from firms other than their own, they admired the most for their management and leadership competence.

When identifying the qualities that made their selection admirable, the most common responses were:

  • a willingness to make change
  • promote ambitious agendas
  • the ability to handle tough issues
  • ability to get people within the firm aligned
  • a commitment to maintaining the core values of the firm

To me it also interesting to note how many of these qualities line up with the goals of of knowledge management.

Amazing Firms, Amazing Practices: Most-Admired Law Firm Leaders

April 27, 2007

The Pointy-haired Boss is Blogging

The Pointy-haired Boss is Blogging

Dilbert – April 26, 2007

Dilbert – April 27, 2007

Updated: Fixed URLs and embedded strips (new feature from Dilbert)

April 27, 2007

RSS in plain English

For those of you that are unsure of RSS, feed readers, or do not know what those buttons in the right column do, this is an excellent video explanation of RSS: RSS in plain English

Thanks to the Business Filter at The Boston Globe and The Common Craft Show.

April 24, 2007

Beyond Email as Communication

As Anne Zelenka points out in her post “Busyness vs. Burst: Why Corporate Web Workers Look Unproductive” email has become a single channel of communication for the busy.

Blogs, wikis and RSS offer additional ways to communicate besides email.

Email was a relative easy transition from letters because the paradigm was the same. You write text and address it to someone. I still occasionally receive emails with the full letter text in the message (Dear Doug: . . . ). Email even carries over the antiquated “cc” and ‘bcc” concepts from the days of carbon paper to produce copies. (Carbon paper for letters disappeared with typewriters).

Email was cheaper and faster than conventional letters, so it is easy to see why its use became so widespread.

Unfortunately, email has quickly become the only communication tool, rather than one of the communication tools. I often will get stuck in an email thread could have been better dealt with on phone call.

The popularity of the blackberry has solidified the prominence of email as the primary communication tool. Being freed from the shackles of you ethernet cable, all of your email can be hanging on your belt.

Email is the knee-jerk response for communication. Everything can go in there: correspondence, contacts, reminders, documents, to-do lists, etc.

If you look at your email traffic you may realize that all of that email need not be in your inbox. Much of it you do not need to respond immediately (if ever).

A blog can be a better tool if you are announcing something. A wiki can be a better tool for archiving information. Both of these are better ways of sharing information and are more retrievable across the enterprise than email. RSS alerts can be used to promulgate this information through less disruptive means than email.

April 23, 2007

KM 2.0 and Web 2.0

As we have been hit with the flurry of Web 2.0 tools, is Knowledge Management evolving to KM 2.0.?

As Matt points out in KM 2.0, KM has never been about the technology. The technology is just one tool to help unite people with processes to share knowledge.

The big reason Web 2.0 will not mean KM 2.0 is the percentage of participation. If you look at some of the participation percentages for the big Web 2.0 sites, only a very small percentage of user contribute content. [Creators, Synthesizers, and Consumers]

If 1% is the right amount of contributors to Web 2.0 platforms, apply that to the number of workers (or even worse, knowledge workers) in your enterprise. In my case that means for the 750 lawyers in my firm, 8 (I rounded) will contribute to a Web 2.0 like system.

Web 2.0 cannot equate to KM 2.0 because first Web 2.0 needs to be converted to Enterprise 2.0. The massive scale of the internet for producing content fails when it is translated to an enterprise level.

As James Dellow pointed out last month, Web 2.0/Enterprise 2.0 merely provides some new tools for knowledge management.

I am excited to deploy blogs, wikis and RSS in our enterprise. But I do not expect they will operate on our intranet with the same process they do on the internet. In fact, I have been hesitant to even use the terms “blog” or “wiki” in the discussion of the new features coming in the next version of our intranet.

April 20, 2007

Transparency

One of my principles of knowledge management is transparency.

Knowledge workers should easily be able to find out information on a particular knowledge object (i.e piece of information or document) in a repository. They should know how it got there, who put it there, when it got put there, why it got put there, and where to find it in the repository.

April 20, 2007

Storing and Finding

The question in filing or storing material is not, “Where do I put it?”
It should be “Where do I find it?”

You can have the most sophisticated storage systems available, but if you don’t know where to find what’s inside, you’re no better off than having stacks of stuff all over the place.

One of the underlying principles of knowledge management is the sharing of material (i.e. information). As we break down the barriers to sharing, we need to break down the barriers to finding. We need to avoid replacing silos of information with silos of searching.

April 19, 2007

Does IT Make You More Productive

Computerworld.com posted an interview with Marshall Van Alstyne. He and his co-authors Sinan Aral and Erik Brynjolfsson recently completed a five-year study analyzing 1,300 projects and 125,000 e-mails to see how IT affects individual productivity.

Some of the key findings are that heavy IT users do more multi-tasking and therefore and can take on a heavier workload.

Download the whole paper here. [SSRN.com]


April 18, 2007

Searching Precedent vs. Research

My colleague, David Hobbie, thought I should supplement my earlier posts on searching for precedents and research with what makes a good precedent.

Research is about content.
Precedent is about context.

When conducting research the search is focused around the words in the document. When searching for a precedent the context around the document is generally more important than the words in the documents itself.

Here are some factors in a document’s context that make a good precedent:

  • Relevant to your topic
  • Recent (a more recent document has more value than an older document)
  • Final (drafts have less value)
  • From a similar type of matter
  • For a similar client
  • Endorsed by a person you report to
  • Was successful (a winning brief is better than a losing brief)
  • From the same jurisdiction (a pleading in Mass. will have different needs than one from NY; a mortgage for property in Cal. will have different needs than one in Tenn.)

Looking at this list, few if these factors will be evident merely from the words in the document. And to the extent the words are in the document, they probably appear very few times. For example, in a mortgage, the state of the property may only appear once in the jurisdiction section of the document.

We have successfully been using WestKM for substantive legal conduct. It is a successful tool for conducting research on our internal documents.

For precedent searches, we are looking at West KM Transactional and Real Practice. They both use some intelligent indexing to identify some of the good precedent factors mentioned above and control your search using these factors.

The problem with these tools is they move away from users request for a single text box search, like Google. Although, the tools improve a particular type of search they start creating silos of searches on top of our silos of documents.